Suppose that in the governance meeting there is a proposal to add an accountability to a role. And the person filling this role doesn't like this new accountability.
They could raise an objection, and say that since they don't like it, it is a reason why this new accountability creates a tension for them. While it doesn't seem like a valid objection (because its not about the role needs, but about the personal needs of the role filler), testing questions might fail to surface that. That person could simply state that since they don't personally like it, that's in fact a new tension.
Or they could make up some argument about why this proposal will create a new tension.
How would you deal with that?
And more interestingly, where is the space for personal preferences for which work to accept and not to accept in Holacracy?