Holacracy Community of Practice Archive, 2015-2019 Community Holacracy Web Site

Section 2.6.1 Modifying Sub-circles: Creating roles in Super Circle to push to Sub-circle?

*“A Circle may also move its own Defined Roles or Policies into a
Sub-Circle, or move any from within the Sub-Circle into itself.”*

Does this mean I can create a role in the super circle and push it into the
sub-circle?
​​
OR does this rule only apply for the moment when a sub-circle is created?


*An**ne Nynke Jansma*
Sales | Events | Process | Hiring

www.springest.nl
*T: *085 303 2830
*E:* info@springest.nl
1 Replies
Max Hesse
01/12/2017

Hi Anne,

from my understanding "constitutionally" you can always create a role in the super-circle and then immediately push it down to the sub-circle within the same Governance meeting.

My question here is if this is "good Holacracy practice". Generally the super-circle creates the context of the sub-circle but how the sub-circle then enacts its purpose and accountabilities is up to the sub-circle and NOT the super-circle.

Also: From the level of the super-circle the sub-circle is only a role, filled by the Lead Link of the sub-circle.

So from my point of view it really depends on the tension that you are trying to solve. Would adding an accountability to the whole sub-circle also solve your tension and then the sub-circle could find out themselves what they want do with this added accountability within? Then this would be my favorable move.

Best,