Hey, we had last time an objection in a Governance meeting, in which we had difficulties to figure out if it's a valid objection or not.
Part of the proposal was to remove an accountability from a certain role. The role filler of that role objected, because she saw that accountability necessary.
The question was now, how to interpret, if "the proposal would limit your role's purpose or accountabilities".
Some said yes: Since it's connected to the accountabilities of that role.
Some said no: Since the role is still able to do things like before since no policy is limiting it.
Which brings me now to the question, do you treat such objections as valid or invalid?
I know it ultimately can be resolved anyways via another tension, etc. but to be confident while facilitating, it's good to understand how to interpret the rules properly.