Since a Circle is technically a Role, can there be a Non-Core Circle?
Posted in Practicing Holacracy •
By Melissa LaMonica •
10/20/2016
Non-Core Circle?
4 Replies
Gerald Mitterer
10/24/2016
10/24/2016
Hey Melissa,
Are you asking with "non-core circle" if an entire circle can be excluded from the Supercircle's meeting processes?
- Gerald
Melissa LaMonica
10/24/2016
10/24/2016
Yes. I believe I know the answer, but I thought I'd put it out there.
Paul Walker
10/25/2016
10/25/2016
I'd be curious to her H1's thought on this because it's unique, but here's my interpretation:
- You could exclude the Lead Link of the Sub-Circle by making them a minor Role [Section 2.3.3], but I personally see a lot of cons and no pros with doing this.
- I would think this would be extremely unlikely, because if there's such a small amount of work coming from an entire Circle, why would it even need to be its own Circle?
- This would also severely hinder the Super-Circle, because if the LL isn't there, you wouldn't have as much representation from or communication with that Sub-Circle.
- Even if you did exclude the Sub-Circle Lead Link, you couldn't exclude the Sub-Circle Rep Link because the Super-Circle LL doesn't have that authority. So, the LL of the Sub-Circle wouldn't be in the meetings, but the RL would.
Melissa LaMonica
11/16/2016
11/16/2016
Thanks! This makes sense along my line of thinking. I was just curious to see what others thought.