Yesterday I learned, that when the LL of the circle excludes roles from the meeting, they don't get the proposals from "out of governance". I was a little bit surprised, because so they don't get involved in the process of governance. They just get the information-mail, what kind of proposal was accepted.
In general this possibility from the LL, that he can exclude roles from a meeting, for me disagrees with Holacracy. Someone else can decide, if you are allowed to involve yourself. Why it must be defined, that you are exclued? You can anyway decide if you wanna join the meeting. For me it seems like a instrument, if that LL's doesn't wants the people in the meetings. What distrubs me is this power of the LL and reminds me of a chief. I think nobody would join, if it makes really no sense for him. And if somebody gets a tention, that it'should be to often, you can bring it as a normal tention and find a solution.
What do you think?
And is it correct that you can exlude all people of the multi-fill role out of the meetings? In this way, the whole role doesn't has a "voice" in the circle.
I'm really curious about your oppinions.
Thanks in advance.