Holacracy Community of Practice Archive, 2015-2019 Community Holacracy Web Site

How is a tactical tension handled in a Gov meeting?


In the tactical meetings, the facilitator looks out for ongoing expectations, and asks the Agenda item holder to bring it up in the Gov meeting.

Is there anything similar for Gov meeting, where the facilitator can ask the tension holder to bring up certain tensions the tactical meeting?

For example: Let's say someone brings up the following proposal in the Gov meeting, "I propose that the UI Designer make the website responsive".

In the objection round, it's called out as a invalid gov output. 

Since there's already a role with "UI Designer" who has an accountability in this role, is there a need to integrate this objection? Can the facilitator ask the tension holder to bring the proposal as a need in the tactical meeting?


No Replies