I'm trying to find a good governance solution for following:
I'm in a startup (having signed the holacracy constitution). Everybody has a role and all is going pretty fine expect for what is touching to the translation of the company purpose into reality.
Today, the company purpose is defined and the company value proposition and offers are being investigated.
What is happening is that a role (assigned to a single person) takes decision about the proposition without alignment with the others and starting communicating to the outside world. This is fully in line with the holacratic rules BUT
- it's creating a communication mess for the potential customers (receiving different messages of what the company is proposing)
- and I believe that having one person having the authority to decide on the real foundations of the company is not right.
I'm going to raise that tension at the next governance meeting, but I have no idea how this can be solved in holacracy?
I could propose to create a specific circle with a domain for defining the proposition, concepts and offers of the company but even then, the question remain about who decide?
I cannot seek alignment / consensus among this circle.
From what I understand, it will always come to a role / 1 person.
How this can be solved in holacracy?
Thanks in advance for your help !
Angela