The first two accountabilities of the Rep/Cross Link role seem to be very similar, so I'm wondering what the nuance of the difference is.
- Removing constraints within the broader Organization that limit the Sub-Circle
- Seeking to understand Tensions conveyed by Sub-Circle Circle Members, and discerning those appropriate to process in the Super-Circle
This came up because one of our circles is considering creating such a role, and one of the members felt "Removing constraints" was vague. I think it reads as less intuitive for a rep link when broader org is the target entity and the sub-circle is the linked entity. Thoughts?
Also, does it make sense to make any modifications to these accountabilities for a cross link versus a rep link?
P.S. Loving this forum. Excited to give back once I have more experience/understanding to contribute with. Very thankful for how responsive everyone is.