Partner A asked to impact my domain X in specific way Z that we have never done for specific reasons. I said no, but scheduled a meeting to discuss w key players.
I later discovered that someone has chosen to impact domain X in specific way Z. I asked the Circle who had done so. Partner A said they had done so using Individual Action.
Our next Tactical was a couple hours later - during the meeting in my role as (in-house, not licensed) Holacracy Coach I reminded via 'share information' about the specific requirements regarding conditions in which Individual Action is allowed, and the communication/restoration points afterwards.
I don't see a means in constitution to address what has occurred, or in much more general ways, to require partners to adhere to the constitution.
Process Breakdown doesn't seem to address any of this - only if either a Governance process fails (3.5.1) or behavior or output that conflict with rules happens to be noticed by a super-circle Facilitator.
So I, as a partner, am bound to process tensions - mine and yours - and so I have one here, regarding my colleague's choices and lack of compliance to the constitution.
Confirm/Correct - the burden to address these issues is on me, assuming this colleague or someone else in the circle does not.