We've been playing the game about 3 1/2 years now, and to date our process breakdowns have been mostly domain violations, with a couple role assignments outside of governance restrictions and sub-circles not meeting regularly. AND, we've got plenty of shadow power issues to work through to get close to a mostly-functional implementation. So now to the question:
What does 3.5.3a 'to restore due process' actually look like beyond re-education? Can anyone provide some examples of what restoration entails?
If Partner A ignored Governance to take actions outside of established procedure (legacy policy) and make decisions in an area of authority clearly delineated as a domain of Partner B's role, what is there to do?
Your input kindly appreciated