Thanks for this precious work ! I guess that the post you're thinking about is this one, from [@mention:532592670943008396] : ...e-member-role-filler
I'm not sure to get the sense of the following sentence from you're document :
● For all other roles, don’t object to a governance proposal because it contradicts a legacy policy. Let the governance conflict with it, thus creating an incentive for whoever wants to rely on that policy. The status quo is your enemy in this case.
Would you accept to give me an example, an illustration please ?
Thanks again !