Holacracy Community of Practice Archive, 2015-2019 Community Holacracy Web Site


Thanks for you replies, and sorry for not having kept this up.

I was not probably clear in my context, so let me rephrase it differently. In fact my issue is the right understanding of the  Section 3.2.1 "...Finally, a Proposal is always valid regardless of the preceding criteria if it is made solely to help evolve the Circle’s Governance to more clearly reflect activity that is already happening, or to trigger a new election for any Elected Role."

At the Coach training, we talked about "grounded" tension. In other words, to be valid, a tension must reflect a reality + to be inside the Circle's purpose. So you cannot come up with some governance proposal which is completely outside the scope/reality/activity of the circle.

Is it what that section 3.2.1 is about ?