When initially testing the proposal as Facilitator, the proposer said it was only clarifying existing activity or governance. Upon further investigation, I uncovered that part of the proposal was actually a tension driven change.
Example of a clarifying change within this proposal: Creating player spreadsheets
(deadline, release, che cking copies)
Example of a tension-driven change - adding accountability: Deciding how to handle response corner cases when there isn't a standard protocol
Am I required to have the proposer separate these as different tensions/proposals? Or can I test the validity of the tension-driven portion and allow the clarifying elements to remain as part of the same proposal?